Compare the CCI Phantom and HK Army Etha 3 Hive side by side: price, specs, firing modes, weight, and maintenance — and see which paintball gun is the better buy for your style of play.
| CCI Phantom | HK Army Etha 3 Hive | |
|---|---|---|
| Price Tier | Mid-Range | Mid-Range |
| Typical Price | $230-450 | $400-500 |
| Operation | Pump (Nelson valve) | Electropneumatic spool (Gamma Core) |
| Firing Modes | pump | semi-auto, ramping |
| Caliber | .68 | .68 |
| Feed | Vertical / horizontal / stock-class feed | Force-fed |
| Air | HPA/CO2 | HPA |
| Operating Pressure | ~250-400 psi | ~140 psi |
| Weight | 1.8 lb | 2.1 lb |
| Maintenance | Very Low | Low |
The CCI Phantom and HK Army Etha 3 Hive are both mid-range paintball guns, so the choice comes down to how each one fits your game rather than how much you spend. On price, the CCI Phantom runs roughly $180 less, so budget-first buyers will lean its way. Players who want less upkeep should look at the CCI Phantom, which rates very low on maintenance and asks less of you between games. For a higher rate of fire and tournament-style play, the HK Army Etha 3 Hive pulls ahead with its electronic firing modes, while the CCI Phantom keeps things simpler and more rugged. At 1.8 lb the CCI Phantom is the easier carry over a long day on the field. The CCI Phantom is built with pump players and stock-class purists in mind. Bottom line: the CCI Phantom is the stronger all-round pick here, especially for a tight budget.